Let’s get straight to the point. In our industry, writing code that simply works isn’t enough.
While the internet is flooded with tutorials, engineers in aerospace, automotive, and medical fields face a very different reality. You aren’t just writing algorithms. You are managing failure propagation, fencing off Undefined Behavior, and generating the exact evidence needed to prove your system is safe.
You need a structural framework for deciding what is maintainable, what is verifiable, and what each programming language can do for you.
It’s my mission to help you cut through the noise. I am currently building a practical curriculum to equip you to:
Make defensible language choices: Know exactly when to stick with C, when C++ is justified, when Rust is ready, and how to justify those choices to an auditor.
Master your toolchain: Rely on static analysis, compiler diagnostics, and continuous integration to generate solid compliance evidence.
Build structural confidence: Trace risk and reliability from high-level system requirements down to individual lines of code or unsafe Rust blocks.
If you are tired of superficial, fragmented advice that lacks real-world system context, I completely understand. It is incredibly frustrating to navigate the strict requirements of standards like ISO 26262 or DO-178C without a clear, practical roadmap.
That is exactly why I am developing the Safety-Critical Software with C, C++, and Rust course.
More details are coming soon. Keep an eye out for early chapter drafts, technical notes, and behind-the-scenes updates as this takes shape.
By joining the waitlist, you’ll be among the first to know when we open for early adopters. You’ll also receive a 50% reduction in the price when the course officially opens.
Early chapter drafts from my upcoming book and course
A 50% reduction in the price when the course officially opens
My newsletter on safety-critical software with C, C++, and Rust
Zero spam. Unsubscribe anytime.